ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Development and validation of a radiomics-based prediction model for variceal bleeding in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome-related gastroesophageal varices.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive performance of CT-based artificial intelligence for predicting variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Budd-Chiari syndrome: Prognostic scores, special populations, and management challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBudd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is caused by obstruction of the hepatic veins or suprahepatic inferior vena cava, leading to portal hypertension and the development of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs), which are associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Existing risk models for variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients have limited applicability to BCS due to differences in pathophysiology. Radiomics, as a noninvasive technique, holds promise as a tool for more accurate prediction of bleeding risk in BCS-related GEVs.
aimTo develop and validate a personalized risk model for predicting variceal bleeding in BCS patients with GEVs.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 444 BCS patients with GEVs in two centers. Radiomic features were extracted from portal venous phase computed tomography (CT) scans. A training cohort of 334 patients was used to develop the model, with 110 patients serving as an external validation cohort. LASSO Cox regression was used to select radiomic features for constructing a radiomics score (Radscore). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression identified independent clinical predictors. A combined radiomics + clinical (R + C) model was developed using stepwise regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with external validation to evaluate generalizability.
resultsThe Radscore comprised four hepatic and six splenic CT features, which predicted the risk of variceal bleeding. Multivariate analysis identified invasive treatment to relieve hepatic venous outflow obstruction, anticoagulant therapy, and hemoglobin levels as independent clinical predictors. The R + C model achieved C-indices of 0.906 (training) and 0.859 (validation), outperforming the radiomics and clinical models alone (AUC: training 0.936
conclusionWe developed and validated a novel radiomics-based model that noninvasively and conveniently predicted risk of variceal bleeding in BCS patients with GEVs, aiding early identification and management of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.