Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497060›Full record

ReviewPublic health challenges2024

Healthcare setting staff satisfaction in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gizew Dessie Asres, Yeshiwork Kebede Gessesse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health challenges, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gizew Dessie AsresAmhara Public Health Institute Bahir Dar Amhara Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3979-3998
Yeshiwork Kebede GessesseDurbete Primary Hospital, Amhara Regional National State Durbete Amhara Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5425-2241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Job satisfaction means how happy and content people are with their job. Workers who are satisfied with their jobs tend to get more work done and give better care. When workers are not happy at work, they are also not productive as well and many of them leave their jobs. This study aimed to address the level of job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare setting staff in Ethiopia from 2012 to 2022. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Google Scholar and African Index Medicus databases have been searched based on preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled estimate of job satisfaction level was done using the random effects model after significant heterogeneities have been checked by subgroup analysis. Publication bias was checked using funnel plot. Results: Pooled satisfaction level of healthcare workers in Ethiopia was 50.31%. Factors associated were autonomy (pooled odds ratio (POR) = 5.79, 95% CI: 1.99-16.90), training (POR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.69-5.67), organizational policy (POR = 4.71, 95% CI: 2.09-10.61), reward (POR = 4.58,95% CI: 1.51-13.84), payment (POR = 3.89, 95% CI: 1.77-8.54), supervision (POR = 5.34, 95% CI: 3.72-7.67) and work environment (POR = 5.44, 95% CI: 2.80-10.58). Conclusion: About half of healthcare staff in Ethiopia's healthcare settings were satisfied with their job. This result was lower than the job satisfaction level of other parts of the world, even in African countries. Healthcare settings should strive to provide a good working environment, with training opportunities, adequate payment, supportive supervision and conducive organizational policy.

Indexed as

Ethiopiahealthcare settingshealthcare workersstaff satisfactionsystematic review and meta‐analysis

Identifiers

PMID40497060
PMCPMC12060765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.