Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40497018›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

First-in-class intranasal epinephrine spray for anaphylaxis: Dose finding clinical study.

Tair Lapidot, Yuval Tal, Dalia Megiddo, Galia Temtsin Krayz, Carolina Abrutzky, Simcha Blotnick, Oded Shamriz, Alon Hershko, Yoseph Caraco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tair LapidotNasus Pharma Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yuval TalAllergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Dalia MegiddoNasus Pharma Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Galia Temtsin KrayzFormulex Pharma Innovation Ltd, Nes Ziona, Israel.
Carolina AbrutzkyNasus Pharma Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Simcha BlotnickClinical Pharmacology Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oded ShamrizAllergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Alon HershkoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yoseph CaracoClinical Pharmacology Unit, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening clinical presentation of acute systemic allergic reactions. Timely administration of epinephrine, usually by intramuscular autoinjector, is a robust life-saving treatment. Despite the critical necessity, there are multiple deterrents to patients' proper use of epinephrine autoinjectors. FMXIN002 is a novel nasal dry powder formulation of epinephrine in a single-use device, offering first-in-class alternative treatment. Objectives: We sought to measure epinephrine pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety following a single administration of FMXIN002 at doses of 3.6 and 4.0 mg epinephrine versus intramuscular (IM) autoinjector 0.3 mg, in healthy adults. Methods: This was an open-label, single-dose, 3-treatment, crossover, randomized, comparative bioavailability study with 12 healthy adults, female and male. FMXIN002 stability was also tested. Results: FMXIN002 4.0 mg was absorbed faster and in higher amounts by most of the subjects, compared to IM autoinjector: 91% of subjects achieved the clinical threshold of 100 pg/mL plasma epinephrine at 6 minutes after administration of FMXIN002 4.0 mg compared to 55% of subjects treated with IM autoinjector. The area under the curve for 0 to 4 minutes' period was significantly higher for FMXIN002 4.0 mg (geometric mean: 7.49 h ∙ pg/mL vs 2.06 h ∙ pg/mL, respectively; Conclusions: FMXIN002 4.0 mg nasal spray enables faster and higher epinephrine plasma absorbance at the short therapeutic window required for the treatment of anaphylaxis, using a patient-friendly, needle-free, stable and safe device.

Indexed as

allergyAnaphylaxisbioavailabilityepinephrineintranasalpowderspray

Identifiers

PMID40497018
PMCPMC12151664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.