ReviewPlant diversity2025
Global advances in phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of Lauraceae.
Review in Plant diversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Mitochondrial Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Balanced polymorphism in a floral transcription factor underlies the ancient rhythm of daily sex alternation in avocado.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Extroparvum occidentale gen. et sp. nov. and the Cretaceous diversification of Lauraceae.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- The relative role of regional species pools in determining tree species richness and rarity in Chinese subtropical and tropical forests.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- A new species ofBiodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Taxonomic notes onPhytoKeys · 2026Article
- From laurels to parasites: the origin, evolution, systematics, and applications ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Article
- Balanced polymorphism in a floral transcription factor underlies an ancient rhythm of daily sex alternation in avocado.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrating phylogenomic and morphological evidence to solve the taxonomy of Phoebe legendrei (Lauraceae) and closely related species.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comparative Chloroplast Genomics, Phylogenomics, and Divergence Times ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, our understanding of Lauraceae, a large family of woody plants, has undergone significant advances in phylogeny, taxonomy, and biogeography. Molecular systematic studies have elucidated the basic relationships within the family with plastid phylogenomic analyses providing robust support for deep-level relationships between Lauraceae lineages, leading to the recognition of nine tribes: Hypodaphnideae, Cryptocaryeae, Cassytheae, Neocinnamomeae, Caryodaphnopsideae, Mezilaureae, Perseeae, Laureae, and Cinnamomeae, with Mezilaureae validated here. Nuclear genomes and comparative genomics studies have also clarified aspects of the family's evolutionary history and metabolic diversity. Taxonomic studies have focused mainly on the most diverse regions, e.g., tropical Asia, tropical America, and Africa (Madagascar), with six new genera described and five reinstated since the last major overview of the family. The extensive fossil record suggests that Lauraceae diversified globally during the Late Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic. Biogeographic studies indicate that different lineages of the family are sorted into Gondwanan and Laurasian lineages, with patterns resulting from the disruption of boreotropical flora and multiple long-distance dispersal events. Phylogeographic studies, predominantly from East Asia, have shown patterns of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.