ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Surgical Approach to a Medial Epicondylectomy in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cubital tunnel syndrome, a common neuropathy of the upper limb, presents with sensory and motor symptoms, impacting hand function and grip strength. Surgical interventions, such as medial epicondylectomy (ME), aim to alleviate symptoms by relieving pressure on the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Historical attempts to treat this condition date back to the early 19th century, with procedures evolving over time. Modern techniques, including in situ decompression, transposition, and various forms of epicondylectomy, offer different approaches to address nerve compression. This article examined the evolution of ME techniques, highlighting the shift toward anatomical landmark-based referencing for precise osteotomy. Notably, adherence to consistent landmarks such as the ulnar collateral ligament and medial intermuscular septum ensures reproducibility and safety in surgical practice. Through meticulous dissection and osteotomy, ME aims to create a clear pathway for the ulnar nerve, reducing tension and preventing postoperative complications such as symptomatic nerve subluxation. Surgical success relies on thorough preoperative evaluation, precise technique execution, and attentive postoperative care. Complications, including nerve injury and joint instability, underscore the importance of surgical precision and patient monitoring. By prioritizing anatomical landmarks and using meticulous technique, ME offers a reliable solution for cubital tunnel syndrome, providing patients with improved function and symptom relief.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.