ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Safety and Effectiveness of Real-time Direct Vision Liposuction Performed Using Intraoperative Ultrasonography.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantitative Assessment of Cannula Kinematics in Liposuction Surgical Procedures Using a Marker-Based Tracking System.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liposuction is a frequently performed procedure for body contouring. Various advances, such as retraction technology and ultrasonography, have helped achieve better results, verify the correct anatomical level, and increase the safety of the procedure. Methods: The use of intraoperative ultrasonography during liposuction as part of a safety and effectiveness protocol is described in this study. Furthermore, a satisfaction survey was conducted to evaluate the techniques used and the naturalness of the results. Reduction of the deep fat layer at the abdominal and dorsal levels was evaluated via ultrasonography before, immediately after, and 6 months after liposuction. The satisfaction survey was conducted at the end of 6 months. Information regarding the incidence of complications was also obtained. Results: Eighty female patients (mean age: 20-38 y) from Peru, Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina scheduled to undergo liposuction were recruited in this multicenter study. Reduction of 99.26% and 99.07% in the deep fat layer was observed at the abdominal and dorsal levels, respectively. This reduction was maintained at 99.26% and 99.14% at the abdominal and dorsal levels, respectively, at 6 months. No intraoperative complications were encountered during the follow-up period (6 mo). The satisfaction survey revealed a high level of satisfaction with the results. Conclusions: The use of intraoperative ultrasonography aided in locating the anatomical repairs, thereby facilitating adequate infiltration and liposuction. No lesions or complications were encountered intraoperatively or during the follow-up period. The participants reported a high satisfaction rate at 6 months.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.