ArticleJOR spine2025
Injection Volume Is a Better Predictor of Stiffness Restoration Than Injection Force in an In Vitro Study of Nucleus Augmentation of the Intervertebral Disc.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Controlling the Self-Assembly and Material Properties of β-Sheet Peptide Hydrogels by Modulating Intermolecular Interactions.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nucleus augmentation has been proposed as an early-stage intervention for intervertebral disc degeneration and involves the injection of a biomaterial into the nucleus to restore disc height and functionality. The aim of this work was to identify clinically relevant quantitative measures that indicate the mechanical performance of the disc following nucleus augmentation. Method: Bovine tail bone-disc-bone units ( Results: No significant biomechanical differences were observed between the native and treated states, but both were significantly different from the degenerated state. The force delivered during injection was found to ramp to a steady state, followed by a final rapid increase; however, all measures associated with injection force poorly correlated with the level of stiffness restoration. Volume injected and change in disc height from injection had the strongest relationship to stiffness restoration. Conclusion: This work showed that measuring the injection force for injectable treatments of the disc can provide lower and upper limits for delivery, but direct measures are stronger indicators of disc stiffness restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.