ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Inappropriate administration of mitomycin in a cataract patient.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This case report describes the improper administration of intracameral mitomycin after cataract extraction in an 83-year-old male, demonstrating the need for system improvements to prevent "never events." Observations: An 83-year-old male presented with visually significant bilateral cataracts, (right eye (OD): 20/80, left eye (OS): 20/70). He underwent technically uncomplicated cataract surgery in the right eye. At postoperative visit one, vision was 20/250 OD, less than anticipated for unclear reasons. On subsequent visits, the patient was found to have worsening photophobia, increasing conjunctival inflammation, corneal edema, and an elevated intraocular pressure of 27 mmHg. Given the variety and complexity of symptoms despite an otherwise uncomplicated surgery, an investigation was launched. An investigation for Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome (TASS) revealed a mix-up between Cefuroxime and Mitomycin during medication preparation and administration. It was determined that mitomycin was inadvertently injected intracamerally into the patient's eye, causing intraocular toxicity and ultimately, loss of vision. Conclusions and importance: This case underscores the significance of system failures in the healthcare environment and how "never events" may occur even with appropriate protocols in place. The improper administration of mitomycin emphasizes the need for enhanced safety measures, including improved medication labeling, consistent use of time-outs, and reinforcing their importance in high-volume environments. System changes are essential to reduce the risk of errors and protect patient safety. The use of off-label, compounded medications should be minimized when possible. Ophthalmologists and the pharmaceutical industry should continue to seek an FDA-approved antibiotic for intraocular use in cataract surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.