Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496913›Full record

ArticleIJID regions2025

Investigating intestinal parasitic infections and risk factors in fingernails: Public health insights from Tabriz East Azerbaijan Province, Iran.

Nasser Hajipour, Hadi Valizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IJID regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nasser HajipourDepartment of Food Hygiene and Aquatic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi ValizadehDepartment of Food Hygiene and Aquatic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of parasitic infections in nails among individuals from different occupational and social backgrounds and identify associated risk factors influencing infection rates. Methods: A total of 2280 nail samples were collected and analyzed from 380 individuals across various occupational groups. Microscopic examination was performed to detect parasite eggs or cysts. Demographic data, hygiene practices, and health history were recorded to evaluate potential correlations with infection rates. Results: Of 2280 nail samples, 445 (19.51%) were found to be infected. Of the individuals, 89 (23.4%) tested positive, with a higher rate in females (28.2%) than males (16.3%). Illiterate participants showed the highest infection rate (36.6%). Occupations such as toilet conductors (44.1%), beggars (42.9%), and vegetable sellers (31.9%) exhibited significantly higher rates. Risk factors included long nails, pet ownership, poor hand hygiene, and history of diarrhea ( Conclusions: Parasitic nail infections are prevalent, especially among specific high-risk occupational groups and rural populations. Public health measures focusing on hygiene education, handwashing promotion, and sanitation improvements are essential to reduce infection rates and improve overall community health.

Indexed as

FingernailParasitePublic HealthRisk factorsTabriz

Identifiers

PMID40496913
PMCPMC12150046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.