ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Clinically diagnosed tuberculosis and mortality in high burden settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits of three consecutive sputum inductions using nebulized racemic salbutamol versus hypertonic saline in smear-negative or sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Trial
- Association between maintenance dialysis and tuberculosis treatment outcomes in Amazonas, Brazil: a population-based record-linkage cohort study (2001-2023) : Maintenance Dialysis and Tuberculosis Outcomes.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- High two-month mortality in Gabonese adults with and without tuberculosis: A prospective cohort study of patients with presumed pulmonary tuberculosis.IJID regions · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-specific transcriptomic profiling reveals a novel signature for active tuberculosis diagnosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Evaluating tuberculosis treatment outcomes and predictors in five Southern African countries: A multi-country cohort analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsies: feasible and safe use of pathology services in a resource-limited, high TB/HIV prevalence setting.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Host- and pathogen-related determinants of pulmonaryEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Sputum scarcity among adolescents and adults with presumptive tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Informing People-Centered Target Product Profiles for TB Diagnostics: A Multi-Country Qualitative Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), referring to diagnosis without bacteriological confirmation, is common and may affect an individuals' outcomes. We undertook a systematic review to assess the proportion of people with TB who were diagnosed clinically, and mortality compared to those with bacteriologically confirmation in the published literature. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to December 2024 using terms for 'TB' and diagnostic studies. We excluded studies with participants aged <15 years, not reporting clinical and bacteriologically confirmed TB, not conducted in high TB burden settings, and studies that were not trials, cohort or cross-sectional in design. Published summary data was extracted and risk of bias assessed. Summary estimates for proportion of diagnoses that were clinical were calculated overall and by pre-specified subgroups. Risk ratio for mortality of clinical compared to bacteriological diagnosis was evaluated by random effects meta-analysis. This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42023404419). Findings: Our search identified 5693 records, of which 53 datasets were included. 12 studies were rated as low risk of bias. Median proportion of TB diagnosed clinically (n = 85,623) was 40% (95% CI: 31-46%, interquartile range 27%-53%). The proportion of TB diagnosed clinically was higher in people living with HIV and extrapulmonary TB. Clinical diagnosis did not differ by diagnostic modality available or by study year. The pooled risk ratio for mortality (n = 20,523, 10 studies) was 1·5 (95% CI: 1·0-2·2, Interpretation: Clinical diagnosis of TB remains common and was associated with higher mortality risk than bacteriologically confirmed TB, suggesting conditions other than TB that are not being adequately treated. Better understanding of reasons for clinical TB diagnosis and investment in improved diagnostics for TB and non-TB conditions is needed. Funding: UK National Institute for Health and Care Research and Academy of Medical Sciences; US National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.