Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496830›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Clustering change patterns among learners of an online Recovery College in Quebec.

Filippo Rapisarda, Catherine Briand, Catherine Vallée, Brigitte Vachon, Galaad Lefay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filippo RapisardaDépartement d'ergothérapie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Catherine BriandDépartement d'ergothérapie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.
Catherine ValléeSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Brigitte VachonCentre d'études sur la réadaptation, le rétablissement et l'insertion sociale, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Galaad LefayDépartement d'ergothérapie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recovery Colleges (RCs) are educational hubs offering free courses on mental health, well-being, and recovery through mutual and transformative learning. These co-learning spaces bring together individuals with diverse backgrounds-such as those with lived experience of mental illness, family members, and mental health practitioners-to collaboratively produce knowledge on mental health topics. Studies have shown RC participation leads to improvements in several psychosocial dimensions (e.g. mental health literacy, empowerment, well-being, reduced anxiety, stigma) and healthcare utilization. However, the methodological approach of averaging outcomes across all participants can mask important individual differences in experiences and outcomes, which is particularly significant given the heterogeneity of RC learners. In light of these limitations, this study aims to explore the heterogeneity of change among RC learners by identifying different trajectories of change and exploring their determinants. Methods: The study adopts a quasi-experimental longitudinal design with repeated measures, utilizing data from 353 participants recruited from a French-language RC in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at three time points: baseline (T0) prior to program participation, one-month post-program (T1), and three to four months post-program (T2). The study uses clustering techniques to identify distinct patterns of change across participants, focusing on key outcome measures such as well-being, anxiety, resilience, empowerment, and stigma. Results: The results identified three distinct clusters of change trajectories. The largest cluster (Cluster A) demonstrated moderate improvements in well-being, anxiety reduction, and slight increases in empowerment and resilience. Cluster B, characterized by participants with higher baseline well-being and lower stigma, showed improvements in empowerment and a slight reduction in stigma, often linked to participants with clinical backgrounds, such as healthcare practitioners. Cluster C, primarily composed of participants with clinical levels of anxiety and lower baseline empowerment, exhibited significant reductions in anxiety and increases in empowerment over time. Discussion: This study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the diverse outcomes associated with RC participation and highlights the importance of tailoring RC programs to meet the heterogeneous needs of learners. It also reinforces the role of empowerment as a central mechanism of change within the RC model, suggesting that empowerment fosters not only personal growth but also improved well-being and reduced stigma.

Indexed as

cluster analysisempowermentmental healthoutcomeRecovery College

Identifiers

PMID40496830
PMCPMC12150786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.