ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Prediction of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using the comprehensive attention test: a large-scale machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting ADHD in Children and Adolescents With Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review of Common Models.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relies on comprehensive approaches, including clinical interviews, scales, and neuropsychological assessments. However, the process is often limited by issues of reliability and availability. Objective: This study aims to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model using large-scale data from the Comprehensive Attention Test (CAT) to predict ADHD diagnoses. Methods: A total of 11,429 participants were recruited across South Korea and underwent the CAT. Of these, 7,737 were diagnosed with ADHD, including 6,772 with comorbid psychiatric conditions. Additionally, 850 individuals were included as a normal comparison group. Eight ML models were trained on a balanced dataset and validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The CAT, when combined with the ML model, achieved an accuracy exceeding 0.98 in distinguishing pure ADHD cases from normal comparison groups. Classification accuracy was particularly high when distinguishing ADHD with comorbid externalizing disorders from normal control groups, especially in cases with more severe ADHD symptoms. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the CAT, integrated with machine learning models, could serve as a promising tool for diagnosing ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.