Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496821›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Prediction of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using the comprehensive attention test: a large-scale machine learning approach.

Kwang Su Cha, Bongseog Kim, Jun-Young Lee, Hanik Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kwang Su ChaCorporate Research Institute, Happymind Inc., Gwacheon-shi, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Bongseog KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine & Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University (SMG-SNU) Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hanik YooDepartment of Psychiatry, Seoul Brain Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) relies on comprehensive approaches, including clinical interviews, scales, and neuropsychological assessments. However, the process is often limited by issues of reliability and availability. Objective: This study aims to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model using large-scale data from the Comprehensive Attention Test (CAT) to predict ADHD diagnoses. Methods: A total of 11,429 participants were recruited across South Korea and underwent the CAT. Of these, 7,737 were diagnosed with ADHD, including 6,772 with comorbid psychiatric conditions. Additionally, 850 individuals were included as a normal comparison group. Eight ML models were trained on a balanced dataset and validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The CAT, when combined with the ML model, achieved an accuracy exceeding 0.98 in distinguishing pure ADHD cases from normal comparison groups. Classification accuracy was particularly high when distinguishing ADHD with comorbid externalizing disorders from normal control groups, especially in cases with more severe ADHD symptoms. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the CAT, integrated with machine learning models, could serve as a promising tool for diagnosing ADHD.

Indexed as

ADHDattention testcomorbid psychiatric conditionsdiagnostic validitymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40496821
PMCPMC12149198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.