ReviewPublic health challenges2023
Probability of sequelae following
Review in Public health challenges, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, species diversity, and antimicrobial resistance profiles ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Dynamics ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Growth rates and metabolic traits differ by diarrhoeal manifestation inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- The disease and economic burden of notified and underestimated Campylobacter enteritis cases and associated sequelae in Germany.PloS one · 2025Article
- Molecular Responses of the Eukaryotic Cell Line INT407 on the InternalizedPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Probability of sequelae followingPublic health challenges · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reactive arthritis (REA) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) are postinfectious complications of Methods: All studies included in previous reviews and meta-analyses on this topic were retrieved and assessed for eligibility; a systematic literature search was conducted to collect more recent reports. For each sequela, random effects meta-analyses were performed; the risk of bias and the quality of evidence were evaluated. Results: In total, 50 reports of observational studies were included; between 110,765 and 175,839 CE cases were considered for each sequela. The pooled proportion of CE cases that developed a sequela was 1.72% (95% CI 0.81-3.61; prediction interval [PI]: 0.03-47.65) for REA, 0.07% (0.03-0.16; PI: 0.003-1.59) for GBS, 0.22% (0.06-0.73; PI: 0.002-20.69) for Crohn's disease (CD), 0.35% (0.11-1.15; PI: 0.003-28.16) for ulcerative colitis (UC), and 4.48% (1.92-10.08; PI: 0.09-70.62) for IBS. The high between-study heterogeneity could partially be explained by study size and design, the method of assessing sequelae, and the period between CE and sequelae onset. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate for GBS and UC, and low for REA, CD, and IBS. Conclusion: Updated estimates of the probability to develop sequelae after CE are provided, for CD and UC for the first time. However, uncertainty regarding the true probabilities remains, which is reflected in the broad PIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.