ArticlePublic health challenges2023
An examination of an adapted Project ECHO model series during the COVID-19 pandemic in Idaho.
Article in Public health challenges, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid methods for multi-level dissemination of neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19 outpatients: designing for dissemination using the fit to context framework.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- An examination of an adapted Project ECHO model series during the COVID-19 pandemic in Idaho.Public health challenges · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Idaho is a medically underserved and rural state comprised mostly health professional shortage areas for primary and specialty care. Given the state shortages and barriers to access care, the testing and treatment of COVID-19 may be improved through the implementation of telementoring education programs such as Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO). The purpose of this article was to assess session attendance and self-reported healthcare clinician perceptions of the ECHO Idaho COVID-19 series (2020 and 2021), a modified Project ECHO model provided during the COVID-19 pandemic in Idaho. Methods: ECHO Idaho developed a COVID-19 ECHO series for healthcare providers to attend in 2020 and 2021. The sessions included COVID-19 updates specific to Idaho, didactic presentations on prevention, screening, diagnosis, and evidence-based treatments for COVID-19, and case-based presentations. Results: A total of 664 individuals attended the 2020 series and 260 individuals attended the 2021 series, with 1752.5 continuing medical education hours being claimed. Participants reported series participation increased overall knowledge of COVID-19, knowledge of best practices for treatment, and awareness of resources available in Idaho. Further, series participation was perceived to reduce feelings of isolation, enhance access to information, and support healthcare professionals (e.g., provided resources) during the pandemic. Conclusion: Results of this evaluation indicate that the ECHO Idaho COVID-19 series was a useful and valuable program to implement during a pandemic in a rural and frontier state to improve physician knowledge and specialty training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.