Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496758›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025

Machine learning applied to wearable fitness tracker data and the risk of hospitalizations and cardiovascular events.

John Kundrick, Aditi Naniwadekar, Virginia Singla, Krishna Kancharla, Aditya Bhonsale, Andrew Voigt, Alaa Shalaby, N A Mark Estes, Sandeep K Jain, Samir Saba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John KundrickHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Aditi NaniwadekarHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Virginia SinglaHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Krishna KancharlaHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Aditya BhonsaleHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Andrew VoigtHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Alaa ShalabyHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
N A Mark EstesHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Sandeep K JainHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Samir SabaHeart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable fitness trackers generate extensive physiological and activity data, offering potential to monitor health and predict outcomes. Machine learning (ML) techniques applied to these data may enable early identification of adverse health conditions, such as hospitalizations and development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate ML models' ability to forecast the incidence of (1) hospitalizations from any cause and (2) of new diagnosis of CVD, including a composite of heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction (CAD-MI), cardiomyopathy (CMP), and atrial fibrillation (AF). METHOD AND

resultsData from 14,157 participants in the All of Us study that included both Fitbit and electronic health record (EHR) information were censored on the date preceding events and analyzed using various ML classifiers for extracted feature data. Performance metrics included accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and F1 scores. Our overall study population was young (median age 54 years), with good representation of women (67%). For hospitalizations, a Random Forest classifier achieved the best performance (AUROC=0.95, accuracy=0.99, F1 score=0.92). For the CVD events, the best prediction model was gradient boosting (AUROC=0.80, accuracy=0.71, F1 score=0.15).

conclusionML models applied to Fitbit data demonstrate promise in predicting clinical outcomes with strong performance for predicting all-cause hospitalizations and modest performance for predicting incident CVD. Wearable technology could play a role in risk assessment and patient management.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseHeart rateHospitalizationPredictionStep count

Identifiers

PMID40496758
PMCPMC12149649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.