Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496741›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

EEG dataset for natural image recognition through visual stimuli.

Nandan Tiwari, Shamama Anwar, Vandana Bhattacharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nandan TiwariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, 835215 Ranchi, India.
Shamama AnwarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, 835215 Ranchi, India.
Vandana BhattacharjeeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, 835215 Ranchi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a technique for measuring the brain's electrical activity in the form of action potentials with electrodes placed on the scalp. Because of its non-invasive nature and ease of use, the approach is becoming increasingly popular for investigations. EEG reveals a wide spectrum of human brain potentials, such as event-related, sensory, and visually evoked potentials (VEPs), which aids in the development of intricate applications. Developing Apps or Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) devices demands data on these potentials. The present dataset comprises EEG recordings generated by thirty-two individuals in reaction to visual stimuli (VEPs). The rationale behind gathering this data is its ability to support EEG-based image classification and reconstruction while also advancing visual decoding. The primary purpose is to examine the cognitive processes behind both familiar and unfamiliar observations. A standardized experimental setup comprising many experimental phases was employed to capture the essence of the investigation and gather the dataset.

Indexed as

Brain computer interfaceElectroencephalographyVisual imageryVisual stimuli

Identifiers

PMID40496741
PMCPMC12149563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.