Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496715›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Early detection of human Mpox: A comparative study by using machine learning and deep learning models with ensemble approach.

Madhumita Pal, Francesco Branda, Adel Qlayel Alkhedaide, Ashish K Sarangi, Himansu Bhusan Samal, Lizaranee Tripathy, Binapani Barik, Salah M El-Bahy, Alok Patel, Ranjan K Mohapatra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Madhumita PalDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.
Francesco BrandaUnit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Adel Qlayel AlkhedaideDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Turabah University College, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Ashish K SarangiDepartment of Chemistry, School of Applied Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India.
Himansu Bhusan SamalSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences. Centurion university of Technology and Management, Odisha, India.
Lizaranee TripathyDepartment of Chemistry, School of Applied Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India.
Binapani BarikSchool of Pharmacy and Life Sciences. Centurion university of Technology and Management, Odisha, India.
Salah M El-BahyDepartment of Chemistry, Turabah University College, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Alok PatelDepartment of Civil Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.
Ranjan K MohapatraDepartment of Chemistry, Government College of Engineering, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.
Lawrence Sena TugloDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-2384
Mona YoussefDepartment of Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, Benha Teaching Hospital, Benha, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to enhance the early diagnosis of Mpox through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, integrating an ensemble approach to improve classification accuracy. Methods: We used the Mpox Skin Lesion Dataset v2.0, comprising six skin lesion categories, including chickenpox, cowpox, Mpox, measles, hand-foot-mouth disease, and healthy skin. Four models-Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Vision Transformer (ViT), and ConvMixer-were evaluated based on their classification performance. An ensemble model combining ViT and ConvMixer predictions was developed to further improve accuracy and robustness. Performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC were used for evaluation. Results: The ViT model outperformed traditional ML models, achieving 93.03% accuracy in detecting Mpox lesions. The ensemble model further improved diagnostic performance, yielding balanced precision and recall across all lesion categories. The proposed approach demonstrated superior classification accuracy compared to previous studies, highlighting the efficacy of DL-based models in distinguishing Mpox from visually similar conditions. Conclusion: The integration of ML and DL models in an ensemble framework significantly enhances Mpox detection. This AI-driven diagnostic approach offers a scalable, accurate, and efficient solution, particularly in resource-limited settings. Future research will focus on improving model interpretability, federated learning integration, and validation with real-world clinical data.

Indexed as

deep learning modelsensemble approachmachine learning modelsMpoxsix-class classification

Identifiers

PMID40496715
PMCPMC12149340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.