Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496694›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2022

The privilege of COVID-19 vaccine wastage - Hong Kong.

Joshua Yeuk Shun Tran, Phoebe Chi Fei Chan, Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong, Martin Chi-Sang Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joshua Yeuk Shun TranFaculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-7288
Phoebe Chi Fei ChanLi Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.
Samuel Yeung-Shan WongJC School of Public Health and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-6385
Martin Chi-Sang WongCentre for Health Education and Health Promotion JC School of Public Health and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7706-9370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 and its effects continue to ripple through Hong Kong. From strict social restrictions to loosening travel restrictions, from high death rates to high caseloads, and from low vaccine uptake to high vaccine uptake, Hong Kong has experienced the spectrum of COVID-19. Hong Kong being in a position of privilege was able to procure at least three doses per person soon after vaccines became available. However, the public's response to the vaccines was suboptimal, with less than 55% of the population being vaccinated 6 months after the introduction of the vaccines. Though the government tried to encourage active vaccine uptake, various factors, such as perceived barriers, risks, and general distrust, contributed to the hesitancy experienced by the population. Logistical factors such as open and closed vial wastage may also contribute to vaccine waste. This may have led to massive vaccine waste of up to 2 million doses and more uncertainty with how to manage with to-be-delivered vaccines. Vaccine nationalism opened the doors to potential wastage, a symptom of vaccine inequity. Urgent action is needed to address uptake hesitancy and potential suboptimal logistical management to prevent further vaccine wastage.

Indexed as

COVID‐19vaccine inequityvaccine wastage

Identifiers

PMID40496694
PMCPMC12039721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.