Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496683›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2022

Community partnerships in medical education: Narratives of medical students.

Alexandra M Cardoso Pinto, Ethan Malone, Nydile Ramesh, Simisola Onanuga, Nikitha Benny, Christine Pettitt, Richard J Pinder, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra M Cardoso PintoImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-4841
Ethan MaloneImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Nydile RameshImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Simisola OnanugaImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Nikitha BennyImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Christine PettittImperial College School of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Richard J PinderDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.
Shyam Sundar BudhathokiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health School of Public Health Faculty of Medicine Imperial College London London UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While medical education has traditionally been designed, led and delivered exclusively by clinicians and academics, there has been an increasing shift towards diversifying actors involved in training future generations of health professionals. Public and patient involvement in learning increases the likelihood that learning is relevant to the communities we purport to serve. This article explores the experiences of medical students who were partnered with a community-based organisation (CBOs) as part of the intercalated Global Health BSc at Imperial College London. Students involved in this programme highlight opportunities to understand the needs of communities they were placed with, beyond what is possible to understand in clinical practice; this is essential to support them in becoming holistic, patient-centred practitioners. Students also found this opportunity helpful to gain insight into the role and value of the voluntary sector in healthcare and develop transferrable skills in project leadership and management. It is hypothesised that the benefits of this partnership extend to community-organisations; they gain experience working with students, who provide an external view of their services and may be helpful in the delivery of quality-improvement projects. Communities could also benefit from interactions with students by sharing insight into their needs and priorities, and in turn, shaping students' priorities as future health professionals and co-designers of voluntary-sector initiatives within the community. Whilst the establishment of these partnerships does not come without its challenges, this article also highlights lessons for students and institutions undergoing similar programmes, including clarification of goals, stakeholder consultation, sustainability of interventions, voicing the community, timetable flexibility and funding.

Indexed as

community engagementcommunity participationmedical educationpartnershipspublic involvementservice evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40496683
PMCPMC12039685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.