ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Spinal Cord Stimulation Alleviates Sensitization of Neuropathic Pain by Upregulating G Protein-Coupled Receptors to Inhibit Overexpression of Cav2.2 and Its Downstream Excitatory Neurotransmitters.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in pain mechanisms and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Untangling neuropathic pain: pathophysiological insights and future directions for targeted therapy.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Spinal Cord Stimulation Alleviates Neuropathic Pain Involves Regulation of the CaCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Focusing on inflammation-driven pyroptosis in postherpetic neuralgia: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Manual Massage Therapy for Neuropathic Pain: Clinical Evidence and Mechanistic Insights.Pain research & management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for various forms of neuropathic pain (NP), including postherpetic neuralgia, phantom limb pain, and painful diabetic neuropathy. Currently, although there have been studies on the analgesic mechanisms associated with SCS, the roles of ion channels in the therapeutic effects of SCS are still unclear. Methods: In this study, NP hyperalgesia was induced in a rat model using chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve. Ten days after modeling, the rats were treated with SCS (50 hz, 200 μs, and 80% motor threshold) for 3 hours each day for 5 consecutive days. The role of ion channels in SCS-induced analgesia was investigated using bioinformatics, western blotting, and immunofluorescence assays. Results: Behavioral analysis showed that SCS treatment for 5 consecutive days increased both the mechanical and thermal pain thresholds of the CCI rats. The bioinformatics results indicated that N-type calcium channels (Cav2.2) were key in the induction of NP-associated hyperalgesia, with the opioid receptor-like 1 receptor (ORL-1) functioning as an upstream inhibitor of Cav2.2. The results also showed that SCS induced analgesia through upregulation of ORL-1 to inhibit overexpression of Cav2.2 and its downstream neurotransmitters, substance P and glutamate. This analgesic effect could be reversed by both Cav2.2 agonists and ORL-1 inhibitors. Conclusion: SCS alleviates hyperalgesia in NP through upregulation of ORL-1 to inhibit the overexpression of Cav2.2 and its downstream neurotransmitters. This may be one of the mechanisms through which SCS induces analgesia. The elucidation of the ion channel mechanism of SCS will improve the clinical application procedures of SCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.