ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Analgesic efficacy of continuous serratus anterior plane block versus intercostal nerve block and their combination in VATS lobectomy: results from a prospective randomized trial.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of anterior serratus plane block and intercostal nerve block in cardiothoracic surgery: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective postoperative pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is essential to optimize recovery and minimize opioid consumption. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), intercostal nerve block (INB), and their combination (SAPB + INB) in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy. Methods: In this single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 90 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for confirmed or suspected lung cancer were randomly assigned to one of three groups: INB ( Results: No significant differences in VAS scores were observed among the three groups at 24 h postoperatively. All groups maintained acceptable pain levels (VAS < 4) throughout the study. However, opioid consumption was significantly lower in both the SAPB and SAPB + INB groups compared to the INB group at all time points ( Conclusions: Continuous SAPB, INB, and SAPB + INB were all effective for postoperative pain management after VATS lobectomy. However, INB alone was associated with significantly higher opioid use. Given its technical simplicity, prolonged analgesic effect, and opioid-sparing properties, continuous SAPB represents a valuable component of multimodal analgesia in enhanced recovery protocols. Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier KCT0009683.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.