Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496632›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2025

Characteristics of persons with varying vaccination personas: data from the CDC-funded PANDEMIC project.

L B Cottler, L C Rosales, V L Seegulam, L Bilello, C L W Striley, A Ravenswood, Z J Martusewicz, C E Murphy, M Eder, G Mudd-Martin and 13 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

L B CottlerDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
L C RosalesDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
V L SeegulamDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
L BilelloUniversity of Florida Center for Health Equity and Research Engagement, Jacksonville, FL USA.
C L W StrileyDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
A RavenswoodDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
Z J MartusewiczDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
C E MurphyUniversity of Florida Center for Health Equity and Research Engagement, Jacksonville, FL USA.
M EderDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMN Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
G Mudd-MartinCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.
L J O'NealDepartment of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
J Brown SpeightsDepartment of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL USA.
C Lopez-QuinteroDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
K D EverettDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.
A H StrelnickDepartment of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA.
S Aguilar-GaxiolaCenter for Reducing Health Disparities, University of California, Davis, CA USA.
H KitzmanPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA.
J A McElroyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.
T A MillayDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
J De LeonDepartment of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL USA.
L WarnekeCollege of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA.
U K WeissDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL USA.
C O'LearyHealth Literacy Media, St. Louis, MO USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Together: Transforming and Translating Discovery to Improve HealthTL1TR001428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCCORMACK, WAYNE T. · 2015 to 2023
$3.9M
15/24- Healthy Brain and Child Development National ConsortiumU01DA055358 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GURKA, KELLY K., SCOTT, LISA S. · 2021 to 2023
$3.7M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001428NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCIRD CDC HHS U66 IP000597NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To examine characteristics of personas related to vaccination via a multi-state survey, to better inform strategies to address vaccine hesitancy, foster trust, and promote equitable health outcomes across diverse communities. Methods: Through a CDC-funded initiative, the University of Florida coordinated and participated with eight partner institutions to increase vaccination uptake and address vaccination hesitancy through trust-building. PANDEMIC (Program to Alleviate National Disparities in Ethnic and Minority Immunizations in the Community) developed an anonymous Survey of Perceptions (SoP), which assessed community perspectives on vaccination. Associations examined persona and gender, state where the interview was conducted, rurality, race/ethnicity, COVID-19 vaccination status, and trusted sources of vaccination information. Results: From September 18, 2023, to October 3, 2024, over 5,500 participants were surveyed through the SoP to assess general viewpoints on vaccination, with five personas characterized: Enthusiast (58.6%), Watchful (21.0%), Cost-Anxious (10.0%), Skeptic (6.2%), and System Distruster (4.2%). Group comparisons were made using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test for continuous variables, and Chi-square tests for categorical variables to assess associations between demographic characteristics and vaccination personas. Conclusions: Understanding vaccination personas and their predictors may provide a framework for designing targeted public health interventions. By addressing the distinct concerns and motivations of each persona, public health strategies promote equitable health outcomes and increase vaccine uptake across diverse populations.

Indexed as

Community engagementVaccination personasVaccination statusVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40496632
PMCPMC12146222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.