SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus entecavir on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are first-line antiviral treatment methods for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, the different effects of TDF versus ETV on the prognosis of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgical resection remain controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the differences of TDF versus ETV in recurrence and survival for HBV-related HCC after liver resection. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science for the related studies published before January 2025. Meta-analysis was performed by use of a random-effects model. Results: A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that TDF was associated with better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR= 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.88) and lower risk of recurrence (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.62-0.86) than ETV in HBV-related HCC patients after surgical resection. Further analysis indicated that TDF reduced the risk of late recurrence (HR= 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.88) rather than early recurrence (HR= 1.00, 95% CI 0.85-1.17) compared with ETV. Also, the pooled results revealed that TDF was associated with better overall survival (OS) (HR= 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74) and lower risk of overall mortality (HR= 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74) than ETV. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided evidence that TDF has better benefits in improving survival and reducing late recurrence than ETV in HBV-related HCC patients after surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.