Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496587›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22025

A machine learning-based risk prediction model for atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients.

Laith Alomari, Yaman Jarrar, Zaid Al-Fakhouri, Emmanuel Otabor, Justin Lam, Jana Alomari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laith AlomariDepartment of Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yaman JarrarDepartment of Medicine, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
Zaid Al-FakhouriDepartment of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Emmanuel OtaborDepartment of Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Justin LamDepartment of Medicine, Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jana AlomariFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) in critically ill patients increases morbidity, hospital stays, and costs. Existing prediction tools are limited in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Objective: This study developed a machine learning-based model to enable early AF risk identification and prevention. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients admitted to the ICU were identified from the MIMIC-IV (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV) database, including 47 clinical and laboratory variables. The primary outcome was AF within the first 48 hours of admission. Multiple machine learning models were trained to predict AF, with the top-performing model undergoing hyperparameter tuning. A compact model was developed using 15 variables and 2 novel features-one identifying patients 70 years of age or older with sepsis and another representing a composite score of pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and predictive values. SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) analysis interpreted individual feature contributions to the model's predictions. Results: The cohort comprised 46,266 ICU patients, with 4.6% developing AF within 48 hours. The CatBoost classifier model achieved an AUROC of 0.850 on the test set, while the compact model with new features yielded an AUROC of 0.820. SHAP analysis highlighted total serum magnesium, age, and the newly created features as key predictors of AF development. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models in predicting AF development in ICU patients. The compact model, with a satisfactory AUROC, can be a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients and facilitating timely interventions.

Indexed as

AFAtrial fibrillationICUMachine learning modelsMIMIC-IVRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40496587
PMCPMC12147569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.