Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496568›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Lipoprotein(a) and its linear association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Ke Qin, Tingyuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ke QinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Tingyuan ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the linear association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 578 patients with ACS who were hospitalized at Henan Provincial People's Hospital between January 2020 and January 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: lower Lp(a) group (≤ 300 mg/L) and higher Lp(a) group (> 300 mg/L). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox regression models, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the association between Lp(a) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was conducted to explore nonlinear associations. Results: During a median follow-up of 27.5 months, a total of 124 all-cause deaths occurred (21.5%), of which 79 cases (13.7%) were classified as cardiovascular deaths. Compared to the lower Lp(a) group, the higher Lp(a) group exhibited a significantly increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality across all models. In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 1.719 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.197-2.470, P = 0.003), while the HR for cardiovascular mortality was 2.505 (95% CI: 1.529-4.102, P < 0.001). In an additional analysis using a 500 mg/L cut-off, patients with Lp(a) > 500 mg/L had a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR = 2.209, P = 0.001), while the association with all-cause mortality (P = 0.284) was not statistically significant in the fully adjusted model. When Lp(a) was analyzed as a continuous variable, each 90 mg/L increase in Lp(a) was associated with a 5% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.052, 95% CI: 1.003-1.104, P = 0.038), and each 45 mg/L increase was associated with a 5% higher risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.054, 95% CI: 1.026-1.084, P < 0.001). For log10-transformed Lp(a), the HR was 1.954 (95% CI: 1.252-3.050, P = 0.003) for all-cause mortality and 3.913 (95% CI: 2.108-7.265, P < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality. Similarly, for standardized Lp(a) (Z-score), the HR was 1.178 (95% CI: 1.009-1.375, P = 0.038) for all-cause mortality and 1.408 (95% CI: 1.179-1.681, P < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality. Most subgroup analyses showed that elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (P < 0.05). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, with significant associations persisting after excluding patients with early mortality or without stent implantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that both all-cause and cardiovascular survival rates were significantly lower in the high Lp(a) group compared to the low Lp(a) group (P < 0.001 for both). RCS analyses revealed a linear positive association between Lp(a) levels and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Conclusions: Higher Lp(a) levels were independently and linearly associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in ACS patients.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeCardiovascular DiseasesLipoprotein(a)AgedBiomarkersCause of DeathChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkersLipoprotein(a)acute coronary syndromeall-cause mortalitycardiovascular mortalitylipoprotein(a)restricted cubic spline

Identifiers

PMID40496568
PMCPMC12148871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.