Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496560›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Use and utility of endocrine multidisciplinary tumour board: an appraisal from a tertiary centre.

Clotilde Sparano, Letizia Canu, Giuliano Perigli, Roberto Santoro, Silvia Pradella, Giulia Grazzini, Monica Mangoni, Gabriele Simontacchi, Benedetta Fibbi, Vania Vezzosi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Clotilde SparanoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Letizia CanuDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giuliano PerigliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Roberto SantoroHead and Neck Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Silvia PradellaDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Giulia GrazziniDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Monica MangoniRadiotherapy Unit, Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Gabriele SimontacchiRadiotherapy Unit, Department of Experimental, Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Benedetta FibbiEndocrinology Unit, Medical-Geriatric Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Vania VezzosiDepartment of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Catia OliantiUnit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Image Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Mario MaggiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Luisa PetroneEndocrinology Unit, Medical-Geriatric Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Endocrine Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (EMTB) is a specialised board for endocrine tumours, including thyroid, adrenal, and rare endocrine neoplasms. Although required by major guidelines, little is known about the current EMTB composition and working outcomes. The present study aims to analyse the use and support provided by an experienced EMTB, highlighting the skills of this board. Methods: This monocentric and retrospective study considered all the cases discussed (N=1038, concerning 835 patients) within the ETMB of Careggi University Hospital of Florence from January 1st, 2021, to December 31st, 2023. The queries have been standardised into five major groups. Besides treatment and follow-up indications, particular attention has been paid to the need for repeated discussions, additional indications, imaging revisions, and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Results: Thyroid and rare cancers were the most frequently represented (64% and 32%, respectively). At logistic regression analysis, the need for multiple discussions was associated with being a rare disease (p<0.001), familiar syndrome (p=0.003), or adrenal masses (p=0.005). When the query was "imaging review," external imaging was more often re-evaluated (p=0.027) due to differing results at EMTB revision, and in about 51% of these cases, further insights were requested. Compared to external control groups, Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma and Adrenocortical Carcinoma showed improved OS, 7.84 vs 2.46 months (p=0.049) and 51.92 vs 26.17 months (p=0.0076), respectively. From the hormonal perspective, further hormonal investigations were required in about 16% of eligible cases. Conclusions: EMTB is pivotal in managing and optimising common and rare endocrine tumour workups.

Indexed as

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsPatient Care TeamTertiary Care CentersAdultAgedEndocrinologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultendocrine neoplasmshealth caremultidisciplinary tumour boardrare diseasesthyroid neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40496560
PMCPMC12148920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.