Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496553›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Denosumab in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta and a historical control study with alendronate.

Yazhao Mei, Shiya Cai, Yunyi Jiang, Yuan Tian, Li Shen, Jiemei Gu, Chun Wang, Zhenlin Zhang, Hao Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yazhao Mei *Shanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shiya Cai *Shanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yunyi JiangShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuan TianShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Li ShenClinical Research Center, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiemei GuShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chun WangShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhenlin ZhangShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hao ZhangShanghai Clinical Research Center of Bone Disease, Department of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Optimal dosing of denosumab in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) remains undefined. This prospective cohort study evaluated the 12-month efficacy and safety of denosumab in OI patients, with a historical control study with alendronate. Materials and methods: Eight pediatric patients (1 mg/kg every 3 months; ≤60 mg/dose) and ten adults (60 mg every 6 months) received denosumab. Outcomes included lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), vertebral compression fractures (assessed via AI-assisted Genant grading [AI_OVF_SH system]), fracture incidence, height velocity and adverse events. Historical controls (n=25 alendronate-treated OI patients) were analyzed for comparative efficacy. Sensitivity analyses excluded female pediatric participants (n=4) and peri-/post-menopausal adults (n=4) to assess hormonal confounding. Results: Pediatric denosumab recipients exhibited significant LS-BMD (+30.3%, Conclusion: Denosumab demonstrates non-inferior efficacy to alendronate for BMD improvement in OI, with heightened vertebral remodeling and pediatric height gains. However, its overshoot phenomenon in children (rebound hypercalcemia) and hormone-dependent efficacy in adults necessitate risk-stratified use. Age and menopausal status considerations are critical for optimizing denosumab therapy in OI. Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=184231, identifier ChiCTR2300074207.

Indexed as

AlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabOsteogenesis ImperfectaAdolescentAdultBone DensityBone RemodelingChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabalendronatebone mineral densitydenosumabhypercalcemiaosteogenesis imperfecta

Identifiers

PMID40496553
PMCPMC12148890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.