Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496550›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Association of Telehealth Encounters With Lung Cancer Screening Consultation in the U.S.: Preliminary Results.

Zhigang Xie, Sericea Stallings-Smith, Beomyoung Cho, Jennifer Wells, Young-Rock Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhigang XieDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Sericea Stallings-SmithDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Beomyoung ChoDepartment of Public Health, College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Jennifer WellsDepartment of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida.
Young-Rock HongDepartment of Health Services Research, Management, and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To promote lung cancer screening among the eligible population, a crucial step involves a shared decision-making discussion between the patient and primary care provider regarding lung cancer screening services. Little is known whether telehealth visits can be deemed comparable with in-person visits for lung cancer screening consultations. Methods: This study used data from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey 6. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to examine differences in lung cancer screening consultations between telehealth users and nonusers, adjusting for selected covariates. Results: Overall, 41.2% had used telehealth at least 1 time in the past 12 months, and 9.9% had lung cancer screening consultations with their healthcare providers at least 1 time. There was no statistically significant difference in the odds of lung cancer screening consultations with healthcare providers between telehealth users and nonusers (AOR=0.91; 95% CI=0.36, 2.29). Of telehealth users, the odds of lung cancer screening consultations among exclusive phone call users (AOR=1.20; 95% CI=0.23, 6.17) and both video and phone call users (AOR=0.82; 95% CI=0.11, 5.98) were not statistically different from that among exclusive video call users. Conclusions: Despite the overall low rate of patient-provider lung cancer screening consultations in eligible individuals, this study suggests that telehealth and in-person encounters seem to be comparable for lung cancer screening consultations.

Indexed as

lung cancerscreening consultationsmokingTelehealthtelehealth modality

Identifiers

PMID40496550
PMCPMC12150070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.