Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496549›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Nutrition Incentives Associated With Improved Outcomes: 2020-2023 Results From the U.S Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program.

Carmen Byker Shanks, Whitney Fung Uy, Nanhua Zhang, Courtney A Parks, Hollyanne E Fricke, Kenneth Resnicow, Nadine Budd Nugent, Amy L Yaroch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Benefits of Nutrition Education in Local Community Supported Agriculture Sites: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carmen Byker ShanksCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.
Whitney Fung UyCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.
Nanhua ZhangCincinatti Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Courtney A ParksCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.
Hollyanne E FrickeCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.
Kenneth ResnicowUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nadine Budd NugentCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.
Amy L YarochCenter for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, Nebraska.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Populations with low income and food insecurity report low fruit and vegetable intake and high associated diet-related disease. The Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program supports grantees to implement nutrition incentive projects nationwide to provide individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program with incentives to facilitate the purchase and consumption of fruits and vegetables. This study examines the associations between the length of Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program nutrition incentive participation and fruit and vegetable intake, food insecurity, and perceived health status. Study design: Nutrition incentives were available to eligible participants during grantees' multiyear award period between 2020 and 2023. Sixty-five Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program grantees collected cross-sectional surveys from a convenience sample of nutrition incentive project participants. Settings/participants: A total of 23,736 adult Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients (aged ≥18 years) who participated in a nutrition incentive project and completed the cross-sectional survey were involved. Intervention: Nutrition incentive projects varied in implementation at grocery stores, farmers markets, and other food retail spanning across all regions of the U.S. Main outcome measures: Main outcome measures included fruit and vegetable intake, food insecurity, and perceived health status by length of participation. Results: Participants in nutrition incentives at >6 months (cups per day=2.91) demonstrated significantly higher fruit and vegetable intake than first-time participants (cups per day=2.73) and those ≤6 months (cups per day=2.76). Significance ( Conclusions: Nutrition incentives appear to increase fruit and vegetable intake, reduce food insecurity, and result in better perceived health. They are a meaningful public health intervention to address key differences in diet-related outcomes.

Indexed as

dietary intakefood securityfruits and vegetablesinterventionNutrition incentivespublic health

Identifiers

PMID40496549
PMCPMC12150091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.