ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
RNA knowledge-graph analysis through homogeneous embedding methods.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-KG v2.0: an RNA-centered Knowledge Graph with Properties.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MiRInter-Trans: a transformer-based framework for microRNA interaction prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Computational understanding of non-coding RNA pairwise interactions.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: We recently introduced RNA-knowledge graph (KG), an ontology-based KG that integrates biological data on RNAs from over 60 public databases. RNA-KG captures functional relationships and interactions between RNA molecules and other biomolecules, chemicals, and biomedical concepts such as diseases and phenotypes, all represented within graph-structured bio-ontologies. We present the first comprehensive computational analysis of RNA-KG, evaluating the potential of graph representation learning and machine learning models to predict node types and edges within the graph. Results: We performed node classification experiments to predict up to 81 distinct node types, and performed both generic- and specific-edge prediction tasks. Generic-edge prediction focused on identifying the presence of an edge irrespective of its type, while specific-edge prediction targeted specific interactions between ncRNAs, e.g. between microRNAs (miRNA-miRNA) or between small interfering RNA-messenger and RNA-messenger molecules (siRNA-mRNA), or relationships between ncRNA and biomedical concepts, e.g. miRNA-disease or lncRNA-Gene Ontology term relationships. Using embedding methods for homogeneous graphs, such as Large-scale Information Network Embedding (LINE) and node2vec, in combination with machine learning models like decision trees and random forests, we achieved balanced accuracy exceeding 90% for the 20 most common node types and over 80% for most specific-edge prediction tasks. These results show that simple embedding methods for homogeneous graphs can successfully predict nodes and edges of the RNA-KG, paving the way to discover novel ncRNA interactions and laying the foundation for further exploration, and utilization of this rich information source to enhance prediction accuracy and support further research into the "RNA world." Availability and implementation: Python code to reproduce the experiments is available at https://github.com/AnacletoLAB/RNA-KG_homogeneous_emb_analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.