ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
The concentration-independent effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the tolerance of green foxtail to vanadium stress.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Acaulospora delicata, wheat, and aphids under drought stress.Mycorrhiza · 2026Article
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decouple plant growth and vanadium accumulation by reprogramming vanadium dynamics in green foxtail (Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) show significant potential for improving plant tolerance to vanadium (V) stress. However, the pattern and physiological mechanisms behind this effect are not fully understood. Methods: To investigate this, we used green foxtail ( Results: Our results showed root colonization of +AMF plants, whereas no such colonization was observed in -AMF plants. Compared to -AMF plants, +AMF plants showed a more organized arrangement of leaf cells, intact chloroplasts, fewer starch granules, and an intact nuclear membrane. AMF increased leaf chlorophyll a concentration by 49% under high V pollution and that of chlorophyll b by 18% under low V pollution and 36% at medium soil V levels. AMF reduced the concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) by 36%-40% in leaves and increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 20%-84%, catalase (CAT) by 5%-13%, and peroxidase (POD) by 12%-16%. +AMF plants exhibited 13%-32% greater plant height, 17%-23% longer root length, 42%-78% higher shoot biomass, 61%-73% greater root biomass, 16% increased root-to-shoot ratio (at high V pollution), and 7%-13% elevated leaf phosphorus concentration than -AMF plants. Furthermore, +AMF shoots had 16%-30% lower V concentrations than -AMF plants while +AMF roots exhibited 52%-73% smaller V concentrations than the -AMF control. Discussion: These results suggest that AMF increase plant tolerance to V stress by protecting leaf ultrastructure, increasing chlorophyll concentration, reducing oxidative damage as well as biomass-driven V dilution and these effects of AMF were independent of soil V concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.