ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
China's health service collaboration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: barriers and next steps.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Border Meteorological Disaster Medical Rescue Policies in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: A Policy Text Quality Evaluation by PMC Index Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transforming Nursing Education for Nurse Prescribing: A SWOT Analysis of Gynecological Specialist Nurses in the Greater Bay Area.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Cross-jurisdictional access to innovative drugs and devices: a five-year policy and practice review of the Hong Kong and Macao medicine and equipment connect in the Greater Bay Area of China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A study on the equilibrium of older adult care service resources and demand in Guangzhou.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices and associated factors among non-dental healthcare professionals in South China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health service collaboration in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is crucial in addressing the growing healthcare demands driven by increasing migration and economic integration. This study highlights the significance of such collaboration in enhancing cross-border medical services and responding to the region's evolving public health needs. Despite its potential benefits, several challenges impede effective collaboration, including the lack of mutual recognition of medical qualifications, limited interconnectivity of health information systems, and divergent regulatory frameworks that complicate service delivery across the regions. To mitigate these obstacles, the study advocates for the establishment of comprehensive regulatory alignment, which would ensure mutual recognition of healthcare professionals' qualifications. Furthermore, the development of integrated platforms for information sharing and service regulation is essential for fostering effective cooperation in delivering health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.