Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496428›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2024

Community Water Fluoridation a Cost-Benefit-Risk Consideration.

Bill Osmunson, Griffin Cole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bill OsmunsonPrivate Practice Bellevue Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-7105
Griffin ColeCenter for Advanced Dental Disciplines (CADD) Fort Collins Colorado USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over 70 years, the addition of fluoride to public water as community water fluoridation (CWF or fluoridation) with intent to prevent dental caries continues to be controversial, and risks are seldom included in monetary evaluations. Published operational costs and benefits of fluoridation are used, whereas published and clinical experience treating dental fluorosis are utilized to estimate treatment costs of patient-perceived dental fluorosis and lost wages from lower IQ (intelligence quotient). Published estimated caries averted, less operational costs at $8 PPPY (per person per year) were used, compensation for functional and cosmetic dental fluorosis $126 PPPY, and lower earnings from presumed harm of developmental neurotoxicity estimated at $438 PPPY. Net loss from CWF is estimated at $556 PPPY, although some individuals will have significantly more or less loss. Previous economic evaluations of fluoridation have estimated caries averted and costs of operations; however, few evaluations include the costs of treating harm. Fluoridation is not cost-effective if the cost of harm is included. Alternatives for the prevention of dental caries should be promoted, and the cessation of fluoridation is indicated.

Indexed as

dental fluorosisdevelopmental neurotoxicityfluoridationIQ

Identifiers

PMID40496428
PMCPMC12039709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.