Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496357›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025

Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up.

Ionut Negoi

Erratum issuedAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ionut NegoiDepartment of General Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania. negoiionut@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the growing burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) as a global health challenge, it becomes imperative to focus on strategies that can mitigate its impact. Post-treatment surveillance has emerged as essential for early detection of recurrence, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, intensive surveillance strategies have shown mixed results compared to less intensive methods, emphasizing the necessity for personalized, risk-adapted approaches. The observed suboptimal adherence to existing surveillance protocols underscores the urgent need for more tailored and efficient strategies. In this context, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a promising biomarker with significant potential to revolutionize post-treatment surveillance, demonstrating high specificity [0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.97] and robust diagnostic odds (37.6, 95%CI: 20.8-68.0) for recurrence detection. Furthermore, artificial intelligence and machine learning models integrating patient-specific and tumor features can enhance risk stratification and optimize surveillance strategies. The reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, measuring artificial intelligence model performance in predicting CRC recurrence, ranged from 0.581 and 0.593 at the lowest to 0.979 and 0.978 at the highest in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Despite this promise, addressing cost, accessibility, and extensive validation remains crucial for equitable integration into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrecision MedicineEarly Detection of CancerFollow-Up StudiesHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAArtificial intelligenceCirculating tumor DNAColorectal cancerFollow-up protocolsPost-treatment surveillanceTumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID40496357
PMCPMC12146933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.