ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Signaling Pathways, Clinical Features, Screening, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Article
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Dynamic monitoring of immunoglobulin G as a prognostic indicator after curative resection in high-risk stage II-III colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Correction to "Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up".World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Improvement of the sensitivity of circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy: current approaches and future perspectives.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
- New Compass for Precision Oncology: Evidence, Challenges, and Prospects of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the growing burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) as a global health challenge, it becomes imperative to focus on strategies that can mitigate its impact. Post-treatment surveillance has emerged as essential for early detection of recurrence, significantly improving patient outcomes. However, intensive surveillance strategies have shown mixed results compared to less intensive methods, emphasizing the necessity for personalized, risk-adapted approaches. The observed suboptimal adherence to existing surveillance protocols underscores the urgent need for more tailored and efficient strategies. In this context, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a promising biomarker with significant potential to revolutionize post-treatment surveillance, demonstrating high specificity [0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-0.97] and robust diagnostic odds (37.6, 95%CI: 20.8-68.0) for recurrence detection. Furthermore, artificial intelligence and machine learning models integrating patient-specific and tumor features can enhance risk stratification and optimize surveillance strategies. The reported area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, measuring artificial intelligence model performance in predicting CRC recurrence, ranged from 0.581 and 0.593 at the lowest to 0.979 and 0.978 at the highest in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Despite this promise, addressing cost, accessibility, and extensive validation remains crucial for equitable integration into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.