Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496253›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Re-assessment of the risks to public health related to the genotoxicity of styrene present in plastic food contact materials.

EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM), Lambré Claude, Riccardo Crebelli, Maria Da Silva, Konrad Grob, Evgenia Lampi, Maria Rosaria Milana, Marja Pronk, Mario Ščetar, Georgios Theodoridis and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM)
Lambré Claude
Riccardo Crebelli
Maria Da Silva
Konrad Grob
Evgenia Lampi
Maria Rosaria Milana
Marja Pronk
Mario Ščetar
Georgios Theodoridis
Els Van Hoeck
Nadia Waegeneers
Claudia Bolognesi
Emma Di Consiglio
Marcel Mengelers
Zainab Al Harraq
Irene Muñoz Pilar
Sandra Rainieri
Gilles Rivière

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials (FCM) was requested by the European Commission to re-evaluate the potential genotoxicity of styrene after oral exposure and its safety for use in plastic FCM with a specific migration limit (SML) of 40 μg/kg food. A rigorous assessment of the in vivo genotoxicity studies (i) provided by third parties, (ii) identified by a targeted literature search and (iii) reported in the 2019 IARC Monograph was performed. All studies were assessed for reliability and relevance and the results integrated in the weight of evidence. The results provided by reliable in vivo oral genotoxicity studies, covering different genetic endpoints and target tissues, including liver, the primary site of metabolism, demonstrated that the oral administration of styrene in mice and rats up to the maximum tolerated dose (300 and 500 mg/kg body weight (bw), respectively) did not induce genotoxic effects. The Panel concluded that there was no evidence that styrene is genotoxic following oral exposure. For substances demonstrated to be non-genotoxic, according to the EFSA Note for Guidance for FCM, an SML up to 50 μg/kg food would not be of safety concern. Consequently, the use of styrene in the manufacture of FCM respecting the SML of 40 μg/kg food proposed by the European Commission is not of safety concern.

Indexed as

CAS No 100‐42‐5food contact materialsgenotoxicityoral exposuresafety assessmentstyrene

Identifiers

PMID40496253
PMCPMC12149764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.