ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Use video comprehension technology to diagnose ultrasound pneumothorax like a doctor would.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-augmented cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound: a narrative review for pulmonary and critical care clinicians.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Lung Ultrasound for Pneumothorax: Diagnostic Accuracy Compared with CT in Emergency and Critical Care.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency rescue scenes and pre-hospital emergency stages commonly encounter trauma victims. Life-saving measures must be taken at the scene if a trauma patient has pneumothorax; if the patient is not evaluated and diagnosed right away, their life may be in jeopardy. Ultrasound, which has the advantages of being non-invasive, non-radioactive, portable, rapid, and repeatable, can be used to diagnose pneumothorax. However, those who interpret ultrasound images must undergo extensive, specialized, and rigorous training. Deep learning technology allows for the intelligent diagnosis of ultrasound images, allowing general healthcare professionals to quickly and with minimal training diagnose pneumothorax in lung ultrasound patients. Methods: Previous studies focused primarily on the lung-sliding characteristics of M-mode images, neglecting other key features in lung ultrasonography pneumothorax, and used similar technological techniques. Our study team used video understanding technology for medical ultrasound imaging diagnostics, training the TSM video understanding model on the ResNet50 network with 657 clips and testing the model with untrained 164 lung ultrasound clips. Results: The model's sensitivity was 99.21%, specificity was 89.19%, and average accuracy was 96.95%. The F1 score was 0.929, and the AUC was 0.97. Discussion: This study is the first to apply video understanding models to the multi-feature fusion diagnosis of pneumothorax, demonstrating the feasibility of using video understanding technology in medical image diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.