ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India
A study to reveal the rationales of overnight transfusion in a training and research hospital.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monitoring of overnight transfusions would be beneficial to improve blood transfusion safety. The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the practice and need for overnight transfusions (OT) in a teaching and research hospital. Methods: The study was conducted on data from patients who received packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusions between 11 September and 13 October 2023 at a Training and Research Hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Clinical data of patients were obtained from the Hospital Database Management System (HDBS) and blood transfusion order forms. The critical time point of the transfusion process was recorded using HDBS. Results: A total of 1502 PRBCs transfusions were noted during the study period, of which 400 (26.6%) were OT. OT was most frequently administered to patients with symptomatic anemia (34.6%; 138/400) and patients with an Hb level <7 (27.7%; 111/400). The time interval in which OT was most frequently ordered was between 15:00 and 17:00 [20.2% (81/400)], while the most frequent time to start transfusion was between 17:00 and 19:00 [22% (88/400)]. The average time taken from ordering OT to starting OT was 3 hours 41 minutes. The most of patients (36.8%; 91/248) were discharged after 48 hours of transfusion or were still in the hospital for more than 48 hours (20.3%; 50/248). Conclusion: To ensure transfusion safety by reducing OT to a minimum, OT should be used only in emergencies, policies should be put in place to make sure that transfusions can be done during the day easily, and healthcare professionals should be made aware of this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.