Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496167›Full record

ArticlePublic health challenges2024

Status of infection prevention and control programs in 25 facilities of Rwanda: Results from the WHO infection prevention and control assessment framework.

Jean Jacques Irakiza, Christian Mazimpaka, Dieudonne Ndatimana, John Baptist Kalach, Vincent Hatangimbabazi, Edouard Kamuhangire, Alphonsine Mukamunana, Olive Ntakirutimana, Joseline Tengera, Olivier Ruhumuriza and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health challenges, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jean Jacques IrakizaIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Christian MazimpakaIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Dieudonne NdatimanaIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
John Baptist KalachIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Vincent HatangimbabaziIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Edouard KamuhangireMinistry of Health Kigali Rwanda.
Alphonsine MukamunanaMinistry of Health Kigali Rwanda.
Olive NtakirutimanaIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Joseline TengeraIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Olivier RuhumurizaIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Onesime ManishimweIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Assumpta Kayinamura MwaliIntraHealth International Kigali Rwanda.
Erigene RutayisireCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences School of Public Health University of Rwanda Kigali Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is important in ensuring patient safety, protecting healthcare workers, and reducing healthcare-associated costs. The World Health Organization (WHO)-validated Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) was used to evaluate IPC practices in Rwandan healthcare facilities. Methodology: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed 25 health facilities across Rwanda, including district and referral hospitals. Using the IPCAF tool, we assessed eight core components (CCs) of IPC programs. We calculated median scores and interquartile ranges to determine the levels of implementation of IPC practices. Findings: Among the 25 facilities, all showed some degree of IPCAF implementation, with an overall median IPCAF score of 545.0, reflecting an intermediate level. Three facilities (12%) were at a basic level, 16 (64%) at an intermediate level, and 6 (24%) at an advanced level of IPC practices. The presence of IPC guidelines scored the highest among CCs (median: 87.5). About 96% of facilities did not have a dedicated full-time IPC staff, 64% of facilities did not offer IPC training to new staff, and 84% did not have protocols for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Conclusions: This initial IPCAF assessment in Rwanda reveals critical IPC strengths and gaps. These findings highlight the necessity for targeted interventions, such as appointing dedicated IPC staff, strengthening IPC committees, and enhancing IPC training and resources.

Indexed as

Africahealthcare‐associated infectionsinfection prevention and controlInfection Prevention and Control Assessment FrameworkRwandaSub‐Saharan AfricaWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID40496167
PMCPMC12039614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.