ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome subpopulations remained consistent for 28 culture days, displaying therapeutic effects in a silicosis mouse model.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quercetin-loaded exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate microglia-mediated neuroinflammation via an anti-inflammatory mechanism.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Exosome-Based Therapeutics in Dermatology and Beyond: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Innovative Pathways in Burn Treatment: Exosomes and the New Era of Regenerative Medicine.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Exosomes as Precise Regulators of the Osteoimmune Microenvironment: Engineering Strategies for Bone Regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Brain-Derived Exosomes in Neurodevelopmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders: Molecular Insights, Therapeutic Potential, and Translational Challenges.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The clinical translation of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome faces critical challenges in scalable production, subpopulation stability, and therapeutic route optimization. This study systematically addresses these barriers to advance exosome-based therapies. Methods: We established a 28-day biomanufacturing workflow using a Hollow Fiber 3D bioreactor integrated with the RoosterBio exosome-harvesting system. Exosomes were subsequently purified and rigorously characterized at multiple production stages, followed by isotopically labeled with Results: Our findings indicate that (1) the RoosterBio exosome harvesting system in the Hollow Fiber 3D bioreactor enables 28 days production of exosomes, with stable harvesting of the main subpopulations over a certain period; (2) systemic administration via intravenous injection in rats reveals distinct tissue tropism, with isotope-labeled exosomes exhibiting predominant hepatic accumulation; and (3) in the silica-induced mouse silicosis model, respiratory delivery of exosomes significantly improves disease progression, whereas intravenous infusion of exosomes does not yield notable therapeutic effects. Discussion: This study proposes a holistic workflow for early-stage development of natural exosomes as therapeutics, offering guidance on industrial-scale production, purification, and characterization of exosomes with stable subpopulation distribution and functional consistency. It further addresses administration route selection in pulmonary disease animal models and heterogeneity assessment of natural exosomes. These advancements facilitate clinical translation of exosome-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.