Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496121›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

A systematic review of alterations in sensorimotor networks following stroke: implications for integration and functional outcomes across recovery stages.

Nur Shaheera Aidilla Sahrizan, Noorazrul Yahya, Zhe Kang Law, Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Umi Nabilah Ismail, Naela Himayati Afifah, Amirul Azri, Hanani Abdul Manan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07150325 (Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07150325 nacompletednot on this map

Integration of Force Control Training and Mirror Visual Feedback on Stroke Patients on Brain Activation and Hand Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsStroke, Stroke PatientsArmsTIPr, Mirror Visual Feedback Device, Mirror Visual Feedback Device(Blocked mirror)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nur Shaheera Aidilla SahrizanMakmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Noorazrul YahyaDiagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy Program, School of Diagnostic and Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zhe Kang LawNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wan Asyraf Wan ZaidiNeurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Umi Nabilah IsmailMakmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Naela Himayati AfifahMakmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Amirul AzriMakmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hanani Abdul MananMakmal Pemprosesan Imej Kefungsian (Functional Image Processing Laboratory), Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke can result in a wide range of impairments, with sensorimotor dysfunction being among the most common, particularly when the sensorimotor network (SMN) is affected. As the SMN plays a critical role in movement control and coordination, understanding the changes in this network post-stroke is essential for informing recovery and rehabilitation strategies. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Two electronic databases, PubMed and Scopus, were searched for relevant studies investigating the effects of stroke on the SMN across different phases of recovery. Reference lists of selected articles were also reviewed using Google Scholar. A total of 20 eligible studies involving 618 stroke patients and 606 healthy controls were included. Results: The review revealed consistent findings of altered functional connectivity within the SMN following stroke. Despite initial impairments, most studies reported improvement in SMN connectivity over time, attributed to compensatory mechanisms, cortical reorganisation, and functional rewiring. Stroke location significantly influenced recovery outcomes. Supratentorial strokes were associated with poorer motor assessments and slower recovery, while infratentorial strokes had comparatively better outcomes. Lesions in the pontine region were found to cause severe disturbances in both sensory and motor functions depending on lesion extent. Discussion: The findings underscore the brain's capacity for neuroplasticity and reorganisation following stroke. Understanding the temporal and spatial changes in the SMN post-stroke can inform more targeted and effective rehabilitation strategies. These insights are crucial for tailoring interventions that align with individual stroke profiles and promote optimal functional recovery.

Indexed as

Fugl-Mayer Assessmentfunctional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingsensorimotor networksstroke

Identifiers

PMID40496121
PMCPMC12150405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.