Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496093›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2025

Video-based learning for basic surgical skills - A randomized trial.

I Dantas, I Jorge, A Nicolau, M Vales, C Coutinho, S Rodrigues, P Febra, V N Lopes

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I DantasFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
I JorgeRISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
A NicolauRISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
M ValesDepartment of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
C CoutinhoDepartment of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
S RodriguesDepartment of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.
P FebraDepartment of General Surgery, Medio Tejo Local Health Unit, Portugal.
V N LopesDepartment of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills. Design: Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study. Setting: Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Participants and methods: Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented. Results: Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), Conclusion: Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.

Indexed as

Basic surgical skillsmOSATSSurgical educationTeaching methodsVideo-based learning

Identifiers

PMID40496093
PMCPMC12148714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.