Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40496067›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025

A review of research methods for elucidating the microstructure of pharmaceutical preparations.

Peng Yan, Zhiyuan Hou, Jinsong Ding

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peng YanXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410006, China.
Zhiyuan HouXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410006, China.
Jinsong DingXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, 410006, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microstructures of pharmaceutical preparations play a pivotal role in determining their critical quality attributes (CQAs), such as drug release, content uniformity, and stability, which greatly impact the safety and efficacy of drugs. Unlike the inherent molecular structures of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and excipients, the microstructures of pharmaceutical preparations are developed during the formulation process, presenting unique analytical challenges. In this review, we primarily focus on presenting the research methods used to elucidate the microstructures of pharmaceutical preparations, including X-ray imaging (XRI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Raman spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and rheometer technology. Subsequently, we highlight the applications, advantages, and limitations of these methods. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and future perspectives in this field. This review aims to provide a comprehensive reference for understanding the microstructures of pharmaceutical preparations, offering new insights and potential advancements in their development.

Indexed as

Critical quality attributesMicrostructurePharmaceutical preparationResearch methods

Identifiers

PMID40496067
PMCPMC12150094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.