ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2025
Pituitary and pineal gland metastases from pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report and literature review.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms are a group of tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells that can occur in endocrine or non-endocrine organs. Metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine carcinomas are uncommon in clinical practice, with female breast cancer and male lung cancer being the most common primary sources of pituitary metastases. Pituitary and pineal gland metastases from pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors are extremely rare. The current study describes the case of a 68-year-old male patient who first presented with a headache and a small and limited pituitary lesion on saddle MRI, which was initially considered to be a primary pituitary microadenoma and was recommended to be reviewed on an ongoing basis. A total of 4 months later, the patient presented again after worsening of the headache and visual disturbances with diabetes insipidus. On review of the saddle MRI, which showed a significantly enlarged pituitary and pineal regions, the patient was treated with transsphenoidal surgery to completely excise the tumor. However, histopathological and immunohistochemical results suggested a pituitary metastasis from a pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor. Although the pineal region lesion did not undergo surgical pathology to confirm its origin from a pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor, it was highly suspected to be homologous to a pituitary metastasis in combination with the monist diagnostic and treatment concepts, and the imaging manifestations of the lesion. This case highlights the importance of the differential diagnosis of invasive lesions in the saddle region combined with the pineal region. Clinicians should be alert to this rare disease and a multidisciplinary consultation should be performed should be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.