ArticleThe mental health clinician2025
Impact of psychiatric pharmacist-led ambulatory alcohol withdrawal management.
Article in The mental health clinician, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Board-certified psychiatric pharmacists in substance use disorder treatment: Integration, services, and outcomes across care settings.The mental health clinician · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a complication of alcohol use disorder commonly encountered across various healthcare settings. Management of AWS is routinely conducted in the inpatient setting; however, in numerous patients, ambulatory alcohol withdrawal management (AAWM) is safe, effective, and recommended. There is no published evidence describing psychiatric pharmacists, otherwise known as Psychiatric Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners (psychiatric-CPP) impact on AAWM. Methods: This was a single-centered, retrospective review conducted at a Veterans Affairs Healthcare System that aimed to quantify and describe the clinical impact of psychiatric-CPP-led AAWM. Veterans who participated in AAWM with a psychiatric-CPP from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, were included in the study. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: The rate of successful AAWM was 67.6% (n = 23) for 34 total withdrawal episodes. The most common reason for failure was breakthrough withdrawal or cravings at 45.5% (n = 5). The most common medications utilized included gabapentin (62.9%; n = 22), chlordiazepoxide (8.6%; n = 3), and diazepam (8.6%; n = 3). In 3 AAWM episodes, no medications were used. Cost avoidance of outpatient management rather than inpatient management was calculated to be $139,361.24. There were 2 alcohol-related emergency department visits within the first month of psychiatric-CPP-conducted AAWM, and no serious medical complications were noted. Discussion: Psychiatric-CPPs practicing in a Veterans Affairs Healthcare System successfully completed AAWM in a majority of the episodes that were attempted. Additionally, few patients were seen in an emergency department setting for alcohol-related matters after initiation of AAWM, perhaps emphasizing the safety of this service and the need for further use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.