ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Enhancing liver disease diagnosis with hybrid SMOTE-ENN balanced machine learning models-an empirical analysis of Indian patient liver disease datasets.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver cancer segmentator: Metadata-guided confidence scoring for reliable segmentation of colorectal liver metastases in CT.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Integrated Smart Medical Imaging Lab Framework for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment of Pandemic-Prone Diseases.Health science reports · 2026Article
- CardiaTics: An explainable AI integrated heart disease diagnosis model with feature engineering and stacked ensemble approach.Journal of big data · 2026Article
- Explainable AI-driven assessment of hydro climatic interactions shaping river discharge dynamics in a monsoonal basin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From Model to Bedside: What Kind of OSA Risk Prediction Tools Do We Need More of? [Letter].Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The liver is one of the vital organs of human body that performs some of the most crucial biological processes such as protein and biochemical synthesis, which is required for digestion and cleansing. A large number of patients are suffering from liver disease and hence it has become a life-threatening issue around the world. Annually, around 2 million people die because of liver disease, this accounts for around 4% of all deaths, due to factors like obesity, undiagnosed hepatitis, and excessive alcohol consumption. These factors accumulate and deteriorate the liver condition. Immediate action is necessary for timely diagnosis of the ailment before irreversible damage is done. Methods: The work aims to evaluate some of the traditional and prominent machine learning algorithms, namely, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Light GBM for diagnosing and predicting chronic liver disease. Also, real-world datasets often have imbalanced class distributions, causing classifiers to perform poorly, leading to low accuracy, precision, recall values and high misclassification. The Indian Patient Liver Disease (ILPD) datasets also face an imbalance issue. This work presents two hybrid models, namely SMOTEENN-KNN and SMOTEENN-AdaBoost, which can robustly handle the problem of imbalance in real-world datasets, in addition to improving the accuracy of liver disease prediction. We have also designed a hybrid model which involves the combination of Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) for feature selection, SMOTE-ENN to tackle the problem of data imbalance and Ensemble learning for enhanced predictions. Results: The research work also proposed Hybrid Ensemble model on the ILPD and BUPA Liver Disorder Dataset. For the ILPD dataset, the model achieves an overall accuracy of 93.2% whereas for the BUPA dataset, the model attains an accuracy of 95.4%. The Brier Score loss for ILPD dataset is 0.032 and 0.031 for the BUPA Liver Disorder Dataset. Discussion: The research work highlights the potential of data balancing techniques and Ensemble models to improve predictive accuracy in liver disease diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.