ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of 650 nm invasive laser acupuncture on non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of GV20-based wearable low-level laser acupoint therapy for pain on head.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- From concept to practice: intra-articular photobiomodulation for knee osteoarthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Invasive laser acupuncture vs. electroacupuncture for non-specific chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study aims to determine whether 650 nm invasive laser acupuncture (ILA) is safe and effective for pain relief in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in two hospitals in Korea. Individuals with NSCLBP were randomized into two groups: an ILA group and a control group, in a ratio of 1:1. One hundred six participants with NSCLBP were equally assigned to the 650 nm ILA group and the control group. The 650 nm ILA group underwent 650 nm ILA for 10 min, and the control group received sham ILA for 10 min per visit, twice a week for 4 weeks, bilaterally at the GB30, BL23, BL24, and BL25 acupuncture points. All participants were trained on exercise and self-management. The primary outcome was the responder rate at the 3-day post-treatment endpoint, defined as the proportion of patients with more than a 30% reduction in NSCLBP. Results: At the 3-day post-treatment endpoint, participants in the treatment group were approximately 36% more likely to respond to the treatment than those in the control group (odds ratio 4.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.04, 10.79; Conclusion: Our study provides clinical evidence for the safety and efficacy of 650 nm ILA in managing of NSCLBP. This is the first study to use ILA, which differs from previously used conventional laser acupuncture. Systematic review registration: https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?search_lang=E&focus=reset_12&search_page=M&pageSize=10&page=undefined&seq=21591&status=5&seq_group=21591, identifier registration KCT0007167.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.