ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The effectiveness of an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix for retained products of conception (RPOC) formed after abortion at less than 22 weeks of gestation: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy outcomes of patients with retained products of conception following miscarriage treated with relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of an oral GnRH antagonist for retained products of conception (RPOC) carrying a risk of heavy bleeding. Methods: With IRB approval and patient consent, this retrospective study included 97 RPOC cases after miscarriage. Clinical courses of the GnRH antagonist group ( Results: The reduction rate in the maximum RPOC diameter after treatment initiation in GnRH antagonist group was greater compared to that in non-GnRH antagonist group [50 (0-79.7)% vs. 15.4 (0-56.9)]%, Conclusion: GnRH antagonist may be a new therapeutic candidate for RPOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.