ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Advancing large language models as patient education tools for inflammatory bowel disease.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of robot-assisted surgical training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Large Language Models in Providing Evidence-Based Patient Education for Celiac Disease: A Comparative Analysis.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Evidence-Based Medicine: Past, Present, Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article evaluates the transformative potential of large language models (LLMs) as patient education tools for managing inflammatory bowel disease. The discussion highlights their ability to deliver nuanced and personalized information, addressing limitations in traditional educational materials. Key considerations include the necessity for domain-specific fine-tuning to enhance accuracy, the adoption of robust evaluation metrics beyond readability, and the integration of LLMs with clinical decision support systems to improve real-time patient education. Ethical and accessibility challenges, such as algorithmic bias, data privacy, and digital literacy, are also examined. Recommendations emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize LLM integration, ensuring equitable access and improved patient outcomes. By advancing LLM technology, healthcare can empower patients with accurate and personalized information, enhancing engagement and disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.