Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40495909›Full record

ReviewBone reports2025

The prevention of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in eastern and in western countries.

Fjorda Koromani, Jiawei Li, Hiroshi Hagino, Richard Eastell, Annegreet Vlug, Ling Wang, Hua Yue, Yong-Chan Ha, Steven Cummings, Salvatore Minisola and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fjorda KoromaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jiawei LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hiroshi HaginoFaculty of Medicine, School of Health Science, Tottori University, Japan.
Richard EastellDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Annegreet VlugDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jan van Goyen Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ling WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hua YueDepartment of Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yong-Chan HaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Bumin, Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Steven CummingsSan Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Salvatore MinisolaDepartment of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Claus-C GlüerSection Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology and Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Ling OeiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
East Meets West Action Group of the European Calcified Tissue Society

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) are among the most common and clinically significant manifestations of skeletal fragility, contributing substantially to morbidity, disability, and future fracture risk worldwide. Yet, their recognition and management remain inconsistent across regions. To explore differences and similarities in the prevalence, diagnosis, management, and prevention of vertebral fractures, the East Meets West (EmW) Action Group of the European Calcified Tissue Society convened a multi-country exchange among clinical and research experts from Europe, the USA, and East Asia. This report summarizes the discussions and synthesizes current knowledge on the topic. Evidence from China, South Korea, Japan, and Germany shows a wide range in reported VF prevalence and incidence, largely influenced by differences in population aging, imaging access, and diagnostic adjudication methods. While lateral spine radiographs remain the standard for detection in both research and clinical care, variable use of quantitative morphometry (QM), semi-quantitative (SQ), and algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) methods limits comparability. MRI remains the gold standard for assessing fracture acuity, but is not feasible for widespread screening. VFA via DXA is gaining popularity, although underutilized in several settings. Despite the availability of effective pharmacologic treatments, including bisphosphonates, denosumab, and anabolic agents, treatment rates following VF remain suboptimal across all countries studied. None of the countries currently has a nationwide vertebral fracture screening program, although fracture liaison services (FLS) and AI-assisted imaging offer promising pathways forward. The lack of a universally accepted definition and gold standard for VF adjudication continues to hamper clinical decision-making and data harmonization. This report highlights the need for greater international consensus on diagnostic criteria, improved integration of vertebral fracture screening into clinical workflows, and the development of targeted strategies to close treatment gaps and reduce the global burden of vertebral fractures.

Identifiers

PMID40495909
PMCPMC12148749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.