ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Evaluation of physicians' opioid prescribing practices, attitudes, and interactions with other healthcare professionals in optimizing opioid prescribing in Pakistan.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Awareness about opioids crisis, policies and regulation of opioid stewardship at hospitals settings: a nationwide cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals from Pakistan.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of pharmacists' opioid dispensing practices: a cross-sectional study from Pakistan.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The community is facing an imminent opioid crisis, with prescription opioids playing a significant role. We conducted a study to assess physicians' experience with opioid prescribing, their reported degree of confidence in prescribing, any adverse events that occurred, and their interactions with other healthcare providers regarding opioid medication. Methods: From October 2023 to March 2024, physicians in three cities in Punjab, Pakistan, participated in a physical, cross-sectional survey based on questionnaires. A 56-item questionnaire was distributed to physicians working in both public and private hospitals. The demographics and other items were evaluated using descriptive statistics, and the associations between knowledge, attitude, and concerns were tested using the Spearman rho test. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS. Results: Of the 1,009 physicians contacted for the study, 816 (80.9%) answered and completed the survey. The average age of these physicians was 38 years. More than half of the respondents were men, accounting for 58.8% of the total, and an equal proportion of respondents, 56.9%, were from government hospitals. Most individuals (92.2%) were knowledgeable about the possible hazards and negative consequences linked to opioid therapy, and almost as many were aware of the risk factors associated with opioid misuse (90.2%). The majority of physicians displayed a favorable attitude, with 54.9% expressing confidence in their ability to detect patients with a strong propensity for addiction. The majority of physicians expressed worries regarding the use and management of opioids, with only 11.8% indicating no concern about legislation and 7.8% indicating no concern about overdose and abuse. Half (51.0%) of the participants never prescribed opioids, while 5.9% had a tendency to regularly prescribe them to patients. There is a strong positive linear correlation between knowledge and attitude, knowledge and concerns, and attitude and concerns. Conclusion: Prescribers were well aware of risk factors and abuse-related problems and showed a good attitude and positive concerns regarding opioid use. The practices are moderately appropriate and can be further refined by incorporating the proper guidelines and legislations in the curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.